<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 659 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182204</link>
    <description>The High Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s decision, reducing the deposit amount required for hearing the appeal from Rs. 30 lacs to Rs. 15 lacs, to be paid in three equal instalments. This adjustment took into account the appellant&#039;s financial situation as a share broker and LIC agent, aiming to alleviate the burden for hearing the appeal on merits. The Court considered the appellant&#039;s income tax returns and partially allowed the appeal without imposing any costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 18:39:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 659 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182204</link>
      <description>The High Court modified the Tribunal&#039;s decision, reducing the deposit amount required for hearing the appeal from Rs. 30 lacs to Rs. 15 lacs, to be paid in three equal instalments. This adjustment took into account the appellant&#039;s financial situation as a share broker and LIC agent, aiming to alleviate the burden for hearing the appeal on merits. The Court considered the appellant&#039;s income tax returns and partially allowed the appeal without imposing any costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>