<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 683 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182202</link>
    <description>The special leave petition was withdrawn on the petitioner&#039;s request, as counsel stated that the matter appeared likely to be settled out of court. The Supreme Court accordingly dismissed the petition as withdrawn, without examining the merits of the central excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 18:20:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 683 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182202</link>
      <description>The special leave petition was withdrawn on the petitioner&#039;s request, as counsel stated that the matter appeared likely to be settled out of court. The Supreme Court accordingly dismissed the petition as withdrawn, without examining the merits of the central excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>