<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1194 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182189</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of a penalty amounting to Rs. 7,42,707/- under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2006-07. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the cancellation was dismissed as the Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s explanation for non-deduction of TDS to be bonafide, supported by audit reports. The Tribunal emphasized that the imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) is not automatic and concluded that the cancellation of the penalty by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was legally and factually correct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 15:11:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1194 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182189</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of a penalty amounting to Rs. 7,42,707/- under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2006-07. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the cancellation was dismissed as the Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s explanation for non-deduction of TDS to be bonafide, supported by audit reports. The Tribunal emphasized that the imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) is not automatic and concluded that the cancellation of the penalty by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was legally and factually correct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>