https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182181 The Supreme Court upheld the Railway Board's decision to conduct a re-test for Group-D posts due to irregularities, including mass copying and question paper leakage. The Court applied Wednesbury principles and found the re-test to be fair and reasonable. It ruled that candidates do not have an automatic right to appointment based on the first test and directed the Board to proceed with the appointments from the second test results. The Court set aside the High Court's judgment and validated the Board's actions. en-us Thu, 06 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Sep 2023 13:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182181 The Supreme Court upheld the Railway Board's decision to conduct a re-test for Group-D posts due to irregularities, including mass copying and question paper leakage. The Court applied Wednesbury principles and found the re-test to be fair and reasonable. It ruled that candidates do not have an automatic right to appointment based on the first test and directed the Board to proceed with the appointments from the second test results. The Court set aside the High Court's judgment and validated the Board's actions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182181