<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 898 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182177</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the termination of a Peon&#039;s services due to a criminal conviction, emphasizing the importance of proportionality in judicial review. The Court upheld the reduction of the respondent&#039;s punishment to a fine, highlighting the need for a fair and reasonable exercise of power by the disciplinary authority, especially when the offense does not involve moral turpitude. The decision underscored the evolving legal standards towards proportionality in assessing decisions, particularly in cases involving human rights considerations and the balancing of interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 898 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182177</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the termination of a Peon&#039;s services due to a criminal conviction, emphasizing the importance of proportionality in judicial review. The Court upheld the reduction of the respondent&#039;s punishment to a fine, highlighting the need for a fair and reasonable exercise of power by the disciplinary authority, especially when the offense does not involve moral turpitude. The decision underscored the evolving legal standards towards proportionality in assessing decisions, particularly in cases involving human rights considerations and the balancing of interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>