<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1147 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182167</link>
    <description>Commission paid to non-resident agents for services rendered outside India was not chargeable to tax in India because the agents had no business connection or permanent establishment in India. Since tax under section 195 is deductible only from sums chargeable under the Act, there was no obligation to withhold tax on the remittance, and the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) could not stand. The expenditure was therefore allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 11:45:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1147 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182167</link>
      <description>Commission paid to non-resident agents for services rendered outside India was not chargeable to tax in India because the agents had no business connection or permanent establishment in India. Since tax under section 195 is deductible only from sums chargeable under the Act, there was no obligation to withhold tax on the remittance, and the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) could not stand. The expenditure was therefore allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>