<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1147 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182167</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) as the commission paid to non-resident agents for services outside India was not taxable in India. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, emphasizing that tax deduction is only mandatory when the payment is chargeable to tax in India, as clarified by recent judicial decisions and the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation of Sections 195 and 40(a)(i).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 11:45:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1147 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182167</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) as the commission paid to non-resident agents for services outside India was not taxable in India. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, emphasizing that tax deduction is only mandatory when the payment is chargeable to tax in India, as clarified by recent judicial decisions and the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation of Sections 195 and 40(a)(i).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>