<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 136 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327155</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for a detailed verification process. The authority was directed to refund any excess service tax payment found in favor of the appellant. The decision emphasized the importance of thorough examination and fair procedures in handling refund claims under service tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 136 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327155</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for a detailed verification process. The authority was directed to refund any excess service tax payment found in favor of the appellant. The decision emphasized the importance of thorough examination and fair procedures in handling refund claims under service tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>