<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 131 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327150</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore addressed issues related to the impugned order in de novo proceedings concerning the classification of telephone instruments under Chapter 85. The dispute involved goods allegedly sold at a higher price post-clearance, leading to a demand for duty payment based on depot sale price. The Tribunal emphasized the need to adopt the approved assessable value at the factory gate, directing lower authorities to consider the appellant&#039;s factory gate sale prices. The matter was remanded for clear instructions to use the approved assessable value from filed price lists for models sold from both factory gate and depots, aiming for a prompt resolution due to the longstanding nature of the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2016 18:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 131 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327150</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore addressed issues related to the impugned order in de novo proceedings concerning the classification of telephone instruments under Chapter 85. The dispute involved goods allegedly sold at a higher price post-clearance, leading to a demand for duty payment based on depot sale price. The Tribunal emphasized the need to adopt the approved assessable value at the factory gate, directing lower authorities to consider the appellant&#039;s factory gate sale prices. The matter was remanded for clear instructions to use the approved assessable value from filed price lists for models sold from both factory gate and depots, aiming for a prompt resolution due to the longstanding nature of the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>