<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 129 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327148</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to entertain the Central Excise appeal because the tax effect was low, and the appeal was dismissed on that ground alone. No consideration of the substantive dispute was undertaken.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 09:17:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 129 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327148</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to entertain the Central Excise appeal because the tax effect was low, and the appeal was dismissed on that ground alone. No consideration of the substantive dispute was undertaken.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>