https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327145 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a Bill of Entry dated 1.5.2014, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory limitations for filing appeals. The petitioner's argument that the appeal dismissal did not result in a merger of orders was rejected, as the petitioner had already exhausted avenues to challenge the Bill of Entry through an appeal and a previous writ petition. The Court highlighted the need for finality in legal challenges and denied the current prayer in the writ petition, underscoring the significance of complying with statutory timelines to prevent repetitive litigation on the same issue. en-us Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 May 2016 12:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327145 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a Bill of Entry dated 1.5.2014, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory limitations for filing appeals. The petitioner's argument that the appeal dismissal did not result in a merger of orders was rejected, as the petitioner had already exhausted avenues to challenge the Bill of Entry through an appeal and a previous writ petition. The Court highlighted the need for finality in legal challenges and denied the current prayer in the writ petition, underscoring the significance of complying with statutory timelines to prevent repetitive litigation on the same issue. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327145