<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 125 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327144</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision to quash the order extending the show cause notice issuance period and directed the release of seized goods. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the invalidity of serving the notice on the customs agent and the respondent&#039;s entitlement to goods&#039; return under Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 125 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327144</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision to quash the order extending the show cause notice issuance period and directed the release of seized goods. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the invalidity of serving the notice on the customs agent and the respondent&#039;s entitlement to goods&#039; return under Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>