<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 124 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327143</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court in SC Order (5) TMI 124 in 2016, with judges Dipak Misra and Prafulla C. Pant, condoned the delay in the case. The Court issued notice considering the petitioner&#039;s argument that they should benefit from clause 7.17 of the Policy as goods were imported before the license was issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 09:16:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 124 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327143</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court in SC Order (5) TMI 124 in 2016, with judges Dipak Misra and Prafulla C. Pant, condoned the delay in the case. The Court issued notice considering the petitioner&#039;s argument that they should benefit from clause 7.17 of the Policy as goods were imported before the license was issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>