<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 123 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327142</link>
    <description>The Court granted the petitioner liberty to file objections within a specified time frame, setting aside the impugned orders and remanding the matters back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The petitioner was directed to submit objections within two weeks, and the respondent would reconsider the matter after providing a personal hearing. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs, and connected matters were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 09:16:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 123 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327142</link>
      <description>The Court granted the petitioner liberty to file objections within a specified time frame, setting aside the impugned orders and remanding the matters back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The petitioner was directed to submit objections within two weeks, and the respondent would reconsider the matter after providing a personal hearing. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs, and connected matters were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>