<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 108 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327127</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling that no addition should be made for interest apportioned to exempt income under rule 8D(2)(ii). However, it upheld the disallowance computation under rule 8D(2)(iii) as per the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The judgment was pronounced on 22/03/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 09:14:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 108 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327127</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling that no addition should be made for interest apportioned to exempt income under rule 8D(2)(ii). However, it upheld the disallowance computation under rule 8D(2)(iii) as per the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The judgment was pronounced on 22/03/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>