<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 99 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327118</link>
    <description>The appeals of the assessee were partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the appeals of the Revenue were partly allowed. The Tribunal provided detailed directions on each issue, ensuring compliance with relevant legal provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 99 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327118</link>
      <description>The appeals of the assessee were partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the appeals of the Revenue were partly allowed. The Tribunal provided detailed directions on each issue, ensuring compliance with relevant legal provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>