<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 94 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327113</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the addition of Rs. 41,31,432 on account of unexplained deposits was deleted due to insufficient evidence linking the assessee to the bank account. The issue of reopening the assessment was considered academic and not further adjudicated. The order was pronounced on February 2, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 94 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327113</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the addition of Rs. 41,31,432 on account of unexplained deposits was deleted due to insufficient evidence linking the assessee to the bank account. The issue of reopening the assessment was considered academic and not further adjudicated. The order was pronounced on February 2, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>