<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 90 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327109</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the case back to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation. Emphasizing the importance of involving the Valuation Officer and considering all relevant factors, including legal disputes, the Tribunal highlighted the necessity for a fair and accurate valuation process in compliance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2016 20:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 90 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327109</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the case back to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation. Emphasizing the importance of involving the Valuation Officer and considering all relevant factors, including legal disputes, the Tribunal highlighted the necessity for a fair and accurate valuation process in compliance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>