<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1276 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182153</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the interpretation of the sales tax deferred loan incentive scheme, deeming the sales tax amount deferred as paid and not taxable. As a result, the question of reopening assessments and the application of section 43B of the Act on sales tax amounts became academic. The Court directed the assessing authority to reconsider the matter afresh, excluding the points already decided in the judgment, providing detailed analysis and guidance for further assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 09:12:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1276 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182153</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the interpretation of the sales tax deferred loan incentive scheme, deeming the sales tax amount deferred as paid and not taxable. As a result, the question of reopening assessments and the application of section 43B of the Act on sales tax amounts became academic. The Court directed the assessing authority to reconsider the matter afresh, excluding the points already decided in the judgment, providing detailed analysis and guidance for further assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>