<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1082 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182157</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeals, affirming that Section 154 cannot be used to introduce new issues or reargue settled matters. It upheld the decisions on fictitious lease transactions, disallowed depreciation, and included lease rental income. The court also confirmed the procedural correctness of the block assessment and surcharge levy, dismissing the appeals with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 09:12:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1082 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182157</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeals, affirming that Section 154 cannot be used to introduce new issues or reargue settled matters. It upheld the decisions on fictitious lease transactions, disallowed depreciation, and included lease rental income. The court also confirmed the procedural correctness of the block assessment and surcharge levy, dismissing the appeals with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>