<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 622 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182138</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the revenue authorities&#039; decision to disallow commission payments made by the assessee to M/s SLF Ltd. for A.Y. 1995-96 and A.Y. 1996-97. Despite the presentation of agreements, bills, and correspondence, insufficient evidence of services rendered by SLF led to the rejection of the appeals. The ITAT emphasized the need for concrete proof that the commissions were solely for business purposes, which the assessee failed to establish convincingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 15:17:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 622 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182138</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the revenue authorities&#039; decision to disallow commission payments made by the assessee to M/s SLF Ltd. for A.Y. 1995-96 and A.Y. 1996-97. Despite the presentation of agreements, bills, and correspondence, insufficient evidence of services rendered by SLF led to the rejection of the appeals. The ITAT emphasized the need for concrete proof that the commissions were solely for business purposes, which the assessee failed to establish convincingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>