<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 394 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182134</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;proceeding&quot; in Section 29 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 was construed broadly to include execution and enforcement steps, because enforcement is an integral part of the adjudicatory process and incidental to the underlying service dispute. As jurisdiction over such service matters had been withdrawn from civil courts and vested in the statutory tribunal system, the Administrative Tribunal constituted under the Act was treated as the proper forum to enforce final orders of the erstwhile Tribunal. Civil court execution was therefore not available, and enforcement had to be pursued before the Administrative Tribunal under the statutory scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 14:46:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 394 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182134</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;proceeding&quot; in Section 29 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 was construed broadly to include execution and enforcement steps, because enforcement is an integral part of the adjudicatory process and incidental to the underlying service dispute. As jurisdiction over such service matters had been withdrawn from civil courts and vested in the statutory tribunal system, the Administrative Tribunal constituted under the Act was treated as the proper forum to enforce final orders of the erstwhile Tribunal. Civil court execution was therefore not available, and enforcement had to be pursued before the Administrative Tribunal under the statutory scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>