<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1195 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182128</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the Ld. CIT(A) was upheld, confirming that the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method is the most appropriate method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) in this case. The addition of Rs. 6.73 crores made by the AO was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 14:12:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1195 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182128</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the Ld. CIT(A) was upheld, confirming that the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method is the most appropriate method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) in this case. The addition of Rs. 6.73 crores made by the AO was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>