https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327100 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving the revocation of a CHA license and forfeiture of a security deposit. The appellant successfully argued that they were not directly involved in the contravention of Customs Act provisions and that the allegations stemmed from the actions of an employee without a clear link to the appellant. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the procedural time limits were not adhered to as required by regulations, leading to the impugned order being set aside on both substantive and procedural grounds. en-us Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 May 2016 13:30:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327100 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving the revocation of a CHA license and forfeiture of a security deposit. The appellant successfully argued that they were not directly involved in the contravention of Customs Act provisions and that the allegations stemmed from the actions of an employee without a clear link to the appellant. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the procedural time limits were not adhered to as required by regulations, leading to the impugned order being set aside on both substantive and procedural grounds. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327100