<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 860 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182127</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the case to the Commissioners of Customs for reconsideration. The appellant was granted the opportunity to raise the alternative plea and address issues related to Special Additional Duty (SAD). All ancillary issues, including confiscation, redemption fines, and penalties, were to be reviewed by the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 13:28:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 860 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182127</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded the case to the Commissioners of Customs for reconsideration. The appellant was granted the opportunity to raise the alternative plea and address issues related to Special Additional Duty (SAD). All ancillary issues, including confiscation, redemption fines, and penalties, were to be reviewed by the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>