https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182123 The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the Tribunal's majority findings of fact because they raised a pure question of fact. As no legal principle or error of law was shown, appellate intervention was unwarranted and the impugned order was left undisturbed. The appeal was dismissed on the basis that the factual conclusions reached by the Tribunal did not justify reconsideration by the appellate court. en-us Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 May 2016 12:52:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182123 The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the Tribunal's majority findings of fact because they raised a pure question of fact. As no legal principle or error of law was shown, appellate intervention was unwarranted and the impugned order was left undisturbed. The appeal was dismissed on the basis that the factual conclusions reached by the Tribunal did not justify reconsideration by the appellate court. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182123