<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 1020 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182112</link>
    <description>Service tax demand for Goods Transport Operator services was found time-barred because the show cause notice was issued long after the normal limitation period applicable to the relevant period, and the limitation position was governed by the retrospective amendment under Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000. The notice and consequential demand were therefore unsustainable, and relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 11:56:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 1020 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182112</link>
      <description>Service tax demand for Goods Transport Operator services was found time-barred because the show cause notice was issued long after the normal limitation period applicable to the relevant period, and the limitation position was governed by the retrospective amendment under Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000. The notice and consequential demand were therefore unsustainable, and relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>