<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 73 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327092</link>
    <description>Section 195 TDS applies only to sums chargeable to tax in India, so reimbursements of actual logistics expenses paid to overseas agents, being pure pass-through amounts without income element, were outside withholding. The profit component was also not taxable in India because the non-resident entities rendered services wholly outside India, had no permanent establishment, and carried on no operations in India from which income could be attributed under sections 5 and 9 read with the DTAA. Mere agency terminology in the agreements was insufficient to create a dependent-agent permanent establishment. Accordingly, no tax was required to be deducted at source on the remittances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 73 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327092</link>
      <description>Section 195 TDS applies only to sums chargeable to tax in India, so reimbursements of actual logistics expenses paid to overseas agents, being pure pass-through amounts without income element, were outside withholding. The profit component was also not taxable in India because the non-resident entities rendered services wholly outside India, had no permanent establishment, and carried on no operations in India from which income could be attributed under sections 5 and 9 read with the DTAA. Mere agency terminology in the agreements was insufficient to create a dependent-agent permanent establishment. Accordingly, no tax was required to be deducted at source on the remittances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>