<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 70 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327089</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the addition of Rs. 6,44,44,813, holding it was not taxable income but an advance held in a fiduciary capacity. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 3,11,043 under Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii), finding the Assessing Officer correctly applied the provisions. The appeal was partly allowed and partly dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 09:32:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 70 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327089</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the addition of Rs. 6,44,44,813, holding it was not taxable income but an advance held in a fiduciary capacity. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 3,11,043 under Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii), finding the Assessing Officer correctly applied the provisions. The appeal was partly allowed and partly dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>