<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 68 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327087</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) and dismissed the appeal of the assessee. It ruled that the concept of mutuality does not apply to the trust because the trust&#039;s beneficiaries are not identifiable individuals and the transactions do not meet the criteria for mutuality. The income earned by the trust on fixed deposits was held to be subject to tax as there was no mutuality in the transactions between the trust and its beneficiaries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 09:32:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 68 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327087</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) and dismissed the appeal of the assessee. It ruled that the concept of mutuality does not apply to the trust because the trust&#039;s beneficiaries are not identifiable individuals and the transactions do not meet the criteria for mutuality. The income earned by the trust on fixed deposits was held to be subject to tax as there was no mutuality in the transactions between the trust and its beneficiaries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>