<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 55 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and deleted the additions of Rs. 3,74,00,000 under Section 68 and Rs. 8,41,500 under Section 69C. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided ample evidence to establish the authenticity of the transactions, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 09:31:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 55 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and deleted the additions of Rs. 3,74,00,000 under Section 68 and Rs. 8,41,500 under Section 69C. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided ample evidence to establish the authenticity of the transactions, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>