https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327066 The Tribunal extended the stay of the outstanding demand for another six months or until the disposal of the appeal, whichever is earlier. This decision was influenced by the jurisdictional High Court's ruling, which invalidated the third proviso to Section 254(2A) as unconstitutional. The Tribunal emphasized that extensions beyond 365 days are permissible in cases where delays are not the fault of the assessee, cautioning against seeking unnecessary adjournments to prevent the risk of the stay being lifted. en-us Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 May 2016 09:31:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327066 The Tribunal extended the stay of the outstanding demand for another six months or until the disposal of the appeal, whichever is earlier. This decision was influenced by the jurisdictional High Court's ruling, which invalidated the third proviso to Section 254(2A) as unconstitutional. The Tribunal emphasized that extensions beyond 365 days are permissible in cases where delays are not the fault of the assessee, cautioning against seeking unnecessary adjournments to prevent the risk of the stay being lifted. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327066