<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1035 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182101</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the expenditures incurred by the assessee on the leased premises were capital in nature. The case was remitted to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration in light of relevant judicial precedents and specific construction details. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced collectively on May 29, 2015, in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1035 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182101</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the expenditures incurred by the assessee on the leased premises were capital in nature. The case was remitted to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration in light of relevant judicial precedents and specific construction details. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced collectively on May 29, 2015, in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>