<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1173 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182102</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the assessment order for the reversal of input tax credit, and closed the connected miscellaneous petition without costs. The court held that rejecting the claim without taking action against vendors who did not remit tax violated principles of natural justice and established legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 09:30:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1173 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182102</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the assessment order for the reversal of input tax credit, and closed the connected miscellaneous petition without costs. The court held that rejecting the claim without taking action against vendors who did not remit tax violated principles of natural justice and established legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>