<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 661 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182092</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity and legislative competence of the U.P. Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964, and the Bihar Molasses (Control) Act, 1947, finding the restrictions imposed by the State Governments reasonable and in line with economic policy considerations. The court dismissed the appeals challenging the Acts, emphasizing the need for latitude in economic policy formulation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 661 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182092</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity and legislative competence of the U.P. Sheera Niyantran Adhiniyam, 1964, and the Bihar Molasses (Control) Act, 1947, finding the restrictions imposed by the State Governments reasonable and in line with economic policy considerations. The court dismissed the appeals challenging the Acts, emphasizing the need for latitude in economic policy formulation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>