<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1668 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182093</link>
    <description>No prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit was made out in the stay application, so total waiver was declined. Partial interim relief was nevertheless granted by waiving the interest component until disposal of the appeal and limiting the pre-deposit to 60% of the demanded amount. The order was considered with reference to the connected stay matter and the record before the tribunal, and it balanced interim protection with the appellant&#039;s deposit obligation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 16:30:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1668 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182093</link>
      <description>No prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit was made out in the stay application, so total waiver was declined. Partial interim relief was nevertheless granted by waiving the interest component until disposal of the appeal and limiting the pre-deposit to 60% of the demanded amount. The order was considered with reference to the connected stay matter and the record before the tribunal, and it balanced interim protection with the appellant&#039;s deposit obligation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>