<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 859 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182084</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in a case concerning the treatment of share capital and share premium received by an assessee from private limited companies. The ITAT ruled that the share capital/premium was not to be treated as unexplained credits under sections 68/69 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal emphasized the importance of the assessee meeting the initial burden of proof and the lack of evidence linking the funds to undisclosed income. The ITAT referenced the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Lovely Exports Pvt. Ltd. and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, highlighting the need for a clear nexus between funds received and alleged undisclosed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 859 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182084</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in a case concerning the treatment of share capital and share premium received by an assessee from private limited companies. The ITAT ruled that the share capital/premium was not to be treated as unexplained credits under sections 68/69 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal emphasized the importance of the assessee meeting the initial burden of proof and the lack of evidence linking the funds to undisclosed income. The ITAT referenced the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Lovely Exports Pvt. Ltd. and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, highlighting the need for a clear nexus between funds received and alleged undisclosed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>