<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (3) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182083</link>
    <description>Section 48 of the Bihar and Orissa Co-operative Societies Act, 1935 created a special forum only for specified categories of disputes touching a registered society&#039;s business, mainly disputes among members and certain limited disputes involving financing banks or non-members under Section 16(1). The Explanation did not expand that jurisdiction to every society-versus-non-member claim, even where a debt or demand was admitted and only payment terms were disputed. As the dispute over commission and interest for sugarcane supply did not fall within the statutory classes, the Registrar lacked jurisdiction and the matter had to be pursued in the ordinary courts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 14:39:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (3) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182083</link>
      <description>Section 48 of the Bihar and Orissa Co-operative Societies Act, 1935 created a special forum only for specified categories of disputes touching a registered society&#039;s business, mainly disputes among members and certain limited disputes involving financing banks or non-members under Section 16(1). The Explanation did not expand that jurisdiction to every society-versus-non-member claim, even where a debt or demand was admitted and only payment terms were disputed. As the dispute over commission and interest for sugarcane supply did not fall within the statutory classes, the Registrar lacked jurisdiction and the matter had to be pursued in the ordinary courts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>