<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (11) TMI 86 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182077</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the validity of the notifications issued by the Commissioner under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, holding that the entrustment of functions under Article 258(1) had the force of law and that the delegation of authority under Section 5A was valid. The appeal was dismissed with costs in accordance with the majority opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 13:11:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (11) TMI 86 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182077</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the validity of the notifications issued by the Commissioner under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, holding that the entrustment of functions under Article 258(1) had the force of law and that the delegation of authority under Section 5A was valid. The appeal was dismissed with costs in accordance with the majority opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>