<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 432 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182071</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the High Court should not interfere in cases where the allegations can constitute an offense under TADA. The High Court cannot assess the merits pre-trial and must assume charge-sheet allegations as factually correct. The sanction order was deemed valid as the sanctioning authority had considered all relevant materials. The breakdown of law enforcement machinery is not a prerequisite for prosecuting under TADA. The existence of a conspiracy and mens rea was established based on the charge-sheet. The High Court&#039;s criticism of the Designated Court&#039;s order was unfounded. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, directing the Designated Court to proceed with the case promptly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 432 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182071</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the High Court should not interfere in cases where the allegations can constitute an offense under TADA. The High Court cannot assess the merits pre-trial and must assume charge-sheet allegations as factually correct. The sanction order was deemed valid as the sanctioning authority had considered all relevant materials. The breakdown of law enforcement machinery is not a prerequisite for prosecuting under TADA. The existence of a conspiracy and mens rea was established based on the charge-sheet. The High Court&#039;s criticism of the Designated Court&#039;s order was unfounded. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, directing the Designated Court to proceed with the case promptly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>