<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1903 (3) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182066</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the lower courts&#039; decisions that declared the mortgage void due to the respondent&#039;s infancy at the time of execution. The court held that the respondent, being an infant, lacked the legal capacity to contract, making the mortgage void ab initio. The appellants were directed to bear the costs of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1903 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 10:44:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1903 (3) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182066</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the lower courts&#039; decisions that declared the mortgage void due to the respondent&#039;s infancy at the time of execution. The court held that the respondent, being an infant, lacked the legal capacity to contract, making the mortgage void ab initio. The appellants were directed to bear the costs of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1903 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>