https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182066 A minor's false statement of age did not create estoppel where the lender's attorney already knew the true facts and was not misled; a representation to a person who knows it is false does not bar reliance on infancy. The document also states that an infant's agreement is not a voidable contract under the Contract Act because competency to contract is essential, so the mortgage could not be enforced on that basis. Restitution or repayment was likewise not required as a condition of equitable relief, particularly where the lender acted with knowledge of minority. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 1903 00:00:00 +0521 Mon, 02 May 2016 10:44:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182066 A minor's false statement of age did not create estoppel where the lender's attorney already knew the true facts and was not misled; a representation to a person who knows it is false does not bar reliance on infancy. The document also states that an infant's agreement is not a voidable contract under the Contract Act because competency to contract is essential, so the mortgage could not be enforced on that basis. Restitution or repayment was likewise not required as a condition of equitable relief, particularly where the lender acted with knowledge of minority. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Mar 1903 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182066