<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 65 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3278</link>
    <description>Broken biscuits reused in the manufacture of fresh biscuits were treated as captively consumed goods and, on that basis, fell within the captive consumption exemption under Notification No. 67/95. The factual finding rested on the Director&#039;s statement and maintained records showing reuse from 1 April 1996 onwards. The objection that records were not properly maintained was regarded as merely technical and insufficient to displace the factual conclusion. No substantial question of law was found to arise on the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 65 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3278</link>
      <description>Broken biscuits reused in the manufacture of fresh biscuits were treated as captively consumed goods and, on that basis, fell within the captive consumption exemption under Notification No. 67/95. The factual finding rested on the Director&#039;s statement and maintained records showing reuse from 1 April 1996 onwards. The objection that records were not properly maintained was regarded as merely technical and insufficient to displace the factual conclusion. No substantial question of law was found to arise on the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>