<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 64 - HIGH COURT KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3277</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, emphasizing the absence of unjust enrichment and the entitlement of the assessee for the refund amount along with interest. The Court found no substantial question of law in the appeal as both the Commissioner of Appeals and the Appellate Tribunal confirmed the refund claim with interest, which was justified based on the unchallenged orders of the Settlement Commissioner and the Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 64 - HIGH COURT KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3277</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, emphasizing the absence of unjust enrichment and the entitlement of the assessee for the refund amount along with interest. The Court found no substantial question of law in the appeal as both the Commissioner of Appeals and the Appellate Tribunal confirmed the refund claim with interest, which was justified based on the unchallenged orders of the Settlement Commissioner and the Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>