<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 44 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327063</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of traveling expenses, fully allowed the appeal concerning the disallowance of advisory fees to directors, and restored the penalty issue to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The overall result was that the assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2016 20:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 44 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327063</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of traveling expenses, fully allowed the appeal concerning the disallowance of advisory fees to directors, and restored the penalty issue to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The overall result was that the assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>