https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3276 The High Court Bombay dismissed the revenue's appeal against the suspension of a license, set aside by CESTAT in 2007. The court held that the suspension order did not comply with Regulation 20(2) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, meant for emergent situations. The Tribunal's decision was upheld, permitting the appellant to pursue other authorized actions. en-us Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3276 The High Court Bombay dismissed the revenue's appeal against the suspension of a license, set aside by CESTAT in 2007. The court held that the suspension order did not comply with Regulation 20(2) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, meant for emergent situations. The Tribunal's decision was upheld, permitting the appellant to pursue other authorized actions. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3276