<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 24 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327043</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the additions made by the AO under various sections of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the sources of the credits and investments were adequately explained and substantiated with evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2016 13:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 24 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327043</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on all grounds, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the additions made by the AO under various sections of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the sources of the credits and investments were adequately explained and substantiated with evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>