<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 20 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327039</link>
    <description>The court set aside the order transferring jurisdiction under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act, citing the significant passage of time and changed circumstances. The court emphasized the need for a review, deemed the original order invalid, and directed the respondent to reassess and pass appropriate orders in compliance with the law. The writ petition was disposed of with the direction to reevaluate the situation and issue new orders as necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2016 19:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 20 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327039</link>
      <description>The court set aside the order transferring jurisdiction under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act, citing the significant passage of time and changed circumstances. The court emphasized the need for a review, deemed the original order invalid, and directed the respondent to reassess and pass appropriate orders in compliance with the law. The writ petition was disposed of with the direction to reevaluate the situation and issue new orders as necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>