<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 18 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327037</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 to reopen the assessments for AYs 1992-93 and 1993-94, citing the failure to fulfill the essential conditions for such reopening. The judgment emphasized the importance of disclosing material particulars and the procedural requirements for revisiting assessments beyond the prescribed timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2016 19:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 18 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327037</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 to reopen the assessments for AYs 1992-93 and 1993-94, citing the failure to fulfill the essential conditions for such reopening. The judgment emphasized the importance of disclosing material particulars and the procedural requirements for revisiting assessments beyond the prescribed timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>