https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327029 The High Court reversed the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing compliance with amended procedures for Cenvat credit eligibility under Rule 52A. The Court highlighted the necessity of using prescribed documents and endorsed invoices were deemed invalid for credit purposes. The Tribunal's failure to consider statutory changes led to the Court allowing the Tax Appeal in favor of the Revenue, resolving the issue in line with updated provisions governing Modvat and Cenvat credit availing processes. en-us Mon, 25 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327029 The High Court reversed the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing compliance with amended procedures for Cenvat credit eligibility under Rule 52A. The Court highlighted the necessity of using prescribed documents and endorsed invoices were deemed invalid for credit purposes. The Tribunal's failure to consider statutory changes led to the Court allowing the Tax Appeal in favor of the Revenue, resolving the issue in line with updated provisions governing Modvat and Cenvat credit availing processes. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 25 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327029