<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 2 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327021</link>
    <description>A scheme of amalgamation with consequential reduction of share capital was sanctioned where statutory procedure had been followed, the equity shareholders and secured creditors had approved the arrangement unanimously, and the public shareholders of the listed transferee company had approved it by the requisite majority. The Court noted that the Official Liquidator and Regional Director reports disclosed no prejudice to members or public interest, and objections on SEBI compliance, FEMA/RBI requirements, valuation, preference shareholders, reserves, promoter holding, licences, and income-tax matters were satisfactorily answered. The reduction of share capital was treated as integral to the scheme and not prejudicial to creditors or shareholders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 00:32:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 2 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327021</link>
      <description>A scheme of amalgamation with consequential reduction of share capital was sanctioned where statutory procedure had been followed, the equity shareholders and secured creditors had approved the arrangement unanimously, and the public shareholders of the listed transferee company had approved it by the requisite majority. The Court noted that the Official Liquidator and Regional Director reports disclosed no prejudice to members or public interest, and objections on SEBI compliance, FEMA/RBI requirements, valuation, preference shareholders, reserves, promoter holding, licences, and income-tax matters were satisfactorily answered. The reduction of share capital was treated as integral to the scheme and not prejudicial to creditors or shareholders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>