<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 784 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182055</link>
    <description>A writ of prohibition is an exceptional supervisory remedy and cannot be used to stop a competent civil court from deciding issues within its jurisdiction absent clear lack or excess of jurisdiction. The civil court was entitled to examine its own maintainability, including the statutory bar under Section 14 of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956, and the pleas of res judicata or estoppel. Those threshold objections were to be determined first as preliminary issues, and the stay of the related revenue appeal could continue only until that determination was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 784 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182055</link>
      <description>A writ of prohibition is an exceptional supervisory remedy and cannot be used to stop a competent civil court from deciding issues within its jurisdiction absent clear lack or excess of jurisdiction. The civil court was entitled to examine its own maintainability, including the statutory bar under Section 14 of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956, and the pleas of res judicata or estoppel. Those threshold objections were to be determined first as preliminary issues, and the stay of the related revenue appeal could continue only until that determination was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>